From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-22390-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 567 invoked by alias); 22 Aug 2005 19:49:14 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 32516 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Aug 2005 19:48:47 -0000
Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO sibelius.xs4all.nl) (82.92.89.47)
    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 19:48:47 +0000
Received: from elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (root@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl [192.168.0.2])
	by sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j7MJmjCG019344;
	Mon, 22 Aug 2005 21:48:45 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost.sibelius.xs4all.nl [127.0.0.1])
	by elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j7MJmjpR029187;
	Mon, 22 Aug 2005 21:48:45 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (from kettenis@localhost)
	by elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j7MJmY53017992;
	Mon, 22 Aug 2005 21:48:34 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 19:49:00 -0000
Message-Id: <200508221948.j7MJmY53017992@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: dgm69@us.ibm.com
CC: gdb@sources.redhat.com
In-reply-to: <Pine.WNT.4.63.0508221402480.2128@dwayne> (message from Dwayne
	Grant McConnell on Mon, 22 Aug 2005 14:04:55 -0500 (Central Daylight
	Time))
Subject: Re: doublest.[ch] forever?
References:  <Pine.WNT.4.63.0508221402480.2128@dwayne>
X-SW-Source: 2005-08/txt/msg00078.txt.bz2

> Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 14:04:55 -0500 (Central Daylight Time)
> From: Dwayne Grant McConnell <dgm69@us.ibm.com>
> 
> I noticed a comment in doublest.c
> 
> /* XXX - This code should really be in libiberty/floatformat.c,
>    however configuration issues with libiberty made this very
>    difficult to do in the available time.  */
> 
> Does this imply this code might someday be moved to libiberty or was that 
> wishful thinking? Looks like doublest.[ch] has been around a while. Has 
> someone already tried to move the code to libiberty?

Actually I'm thinking about doing the opposite; moving this code out
of libiberty and back into gdb.  Outside gdb, it's only used in
opcodes/m68k-dis.c.

Mark