From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-22482-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 2318 invoked by alias); 6 Sep 2005 16:29:18 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 2306 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Sep 2005 16:29:14 -0000
Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17)
    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Sep 2005 16:29:14 +0000
Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.52)
	id 1ECgJs-0001J4-7q; Tue, 06 Sep 2005 12:29:12 -0400
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2005 16:29:00 -0000
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Miguel =?iso-8859-1?Q?A=2E_Nu=F1ez?= <miguel.nunez@terra.es>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: General purpose registers not in core file
Message-ID: <20050906162912.GA5007@nevyn.them.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Miguel =?iso-8859-1?Q?A=2E_Nu=F1ez?= <miguel.nunez@terra.es>,
	gdb@sources.redhat.com
References: <1971061556421.20050906173932@terra.es> <591061671484.20050906174127@terra.es> <20050906154326.GB3270@nevyn.them.org> <481064362500.20050906182618@terra.es>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <481064362500.20050906182618@terra.es>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i
X-SW-Source: 2005-09/txt/msg00037.txt.bz2

On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 06:26:18PM +0200, Miguel A. Nuñez wrote:
> Thank you Daniel.
> 
> My executable is a 64-bit one. Does this make any difference? Should I use a 64-bit gdb binary?

Yes, absolutely.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC