From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2257 invoked by alias); 10 Sep 2005 15:57:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2231 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Sep 2005 15:57:54 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Sat, 10 Sep 2005 15:57:54 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EE7jk-000146-TM; Sat, 10 Sep 2005 11:57:53 -0400 Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 15:57:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: David Lecomber , gdb Subject: Re: Itanium and GDB on 2.6.x kernels with pthreads Message-ID: <20050910155752.GB2637@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: David Lecomber , gdb References: <1126110236.8094.85.camel@delmo.priv.wark.uk.streamline-computing.com> <20050910152915.GA2637@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050910152915.GA2637@nevyn.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-SW-Source: 2005-09/txt/msg00064.txt.bz2 On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 11:29:15AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > Those sigill's should not be there, should they? Something is > seriously broken in ia64-land... I get them even running > single-threaded, but they're ignored because they happen at > breakpoints. But I'm not convinced that they don't indicate a real > problem somewhere. For the record, the SIGILLs seem to be caused by turning this: nop.b 0x0 nop.b 0x0 br.ret.sptk.many b0 ;; to this: break.b 0xccccc nop.b 0x0 br.ret.sptk.many b0 ;; Seems like a reasonable breakpoint to me. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC