From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22244 invoked by alias); 27 Sep 2005 02:42:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 22209 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Sep 2005 02:42:13 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 02:42:13 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EK5Pz-0005sV-Je; Mon, 26 Sep 2005 22:42:07 -0400 Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 02:42:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Ian Lance Taylor Cc: Bob Rossi , GDB Subject: Re: CVS link error Message-ID: <20050927024207.GA22531@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Ian Lance Taylor , Bob Rossi , GDB References: <20050927002836.GA10821@white> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-SW-Source: 2005-09/txt/msg00205.txt.bz2 On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 05:31:52PM -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > I think this is happening because expandargv in libiberty/argv.c now > calls xmalloc_failed. That is provided by libiberty/xmalloc.c but not > by gdb/utils.c. > > Is there any reason for gdb/utils.c to continue to define xmalloc and > friends? Yes. GDB's versions don't do the same thing on error. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC