Re: Open projects list

[Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>]

On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 12:25:00PM -0700, Stan Shebs wrote:
> I was poking around to see if named threads was written down anywhere
> as a desired GDB feature, and couldn't find it on web pages or in
> sources, which makes me wonder how many other longstanding wishlist
> items aren't known about. I see that there are lots of feature
> requests in bugzilla, but they are more about specific details,
> rather than overall direction, and IMHO the bugzilla format is not
> so helpful for larger or architectural changes that may need lengthy
> background and explanation, like MI levels to support, reverse
> execution infrastructure, native tracepoints, etc. GCC has a
> whole collection of pages under http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/ for
> this kind of thing.
> 
> Does anybody else think we need something like this?

If we want something like this, a Wiki would be a better choice.  GCC
certainly found their wiki to be more effective than the projects
pages, which are mostly translations of old projects from the source
distribution.

Also, I find it somewhat ironic that you said "in bugzilla" since we're
still living in the dark ages of gnats.  I'm torn between setting up a
third independent bugzilla instance on sourceware, or going through the
pain of renumbering all the active references to PRs in the testsuite.
Open to suggestions.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC