From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3832 invoked by alias); 27 Oct 2005 15:23:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 3800 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Oct 2005 15:23:35 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 15:23:35 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1EV9bJ-0006VJ-1r; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 11:23:33 -0400 Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 15:23:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Efim Monjak Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: break of time loop Message-ID: <20051027152333.GA24943@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Efim Monjak , gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <4360EFE7.6030406@lipowsky.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4360EFE7.6030406@lipowsky.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-SW-Source: 2005-10/txt/msg00165.txt.bz2 On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 05:19:03PM +0200, Efim Monjak wrote: > Hier a part of transcript and a part of ethereal protocol. they are > from different sessions but I think it is the same case. > The ctrl+c is sent before "step" command is responsed. The response for > "step" is recognised as response for ctrl+c, > possibly the trap signal don't means the loop processing is stopped. > After it next "step" command is sent and the > response for ctrl+c, which is sent at the same time with interrupt > signal, is ignored. > I hope you can understand my english:) If you receive a C-c after sending a stop response, you should ignore the C-c, not send another. Then this won't happen. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC