From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20437 invoked by alias); 3 Nov 2005 21:23:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 20419 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Nov 2005 21:23:53 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Nov 2005 21:23:53 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1EXmYo-00036H-2N; Thu, 03 Nov 2005 16:23:50 -0500 Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2005 21:23:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Efim Monjak Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: break of time loop Message-ID: <20051103212350.GB11828@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Efim Monjak , gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <4369E990.9060305@lipowsky.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4369E990.9060305@lipowsky.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-SW-Source: 2005-11/txt/msg00077.txt.bz2 On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 11:42:24AM +0100, Efim Monjak wrote: > Hi all, > > is there a particular time between send a "step" command and ctrl+c. No, the ctrl-c is processed whenever GDB receives it from the user, if the target is running. > I see the ctrl+c charakter on different place depend on performanse of > target. > If I set a big delay before send "step" response I see about 1 sec. > between "step" command > and ctrl+c. Signal Interrupt which stops the time loop after ctrl+c > don't stops > the loop if ctrl+c is received after "stop" response but to close to > next "step" > command to send a special responce to ctrl+c. In this case next "step" > is responced > with interrupt signal. But the loop will not be stopped. Sorry, I can not follow the situation you are describing. I would need to see an example session. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC