From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7218 invoked by alias); 4 Nov 2005 10:19:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 7192 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Nov 2005 10:19:51 -0000 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Nov 2005 10:19:51 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jA4AJnuC030552 for ; Fri, 4 Nov 2005 05:19:49 -0500 Received: from calimero.vinschen.de (vpn50-64.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.64]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id jA4AJmV20730 for ; Fri, 4 Nov 2005 05:19:48 -0500 Received: by calimero.vinschen.de (Postfix, from userid 500) id 9A87A544001; Fri, 4 Nov 2005 11:19:42 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2005 10:19:00 -0000 From: Corinna Vinschen To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Status on cross builds Message-ID: <20051104101942.GY2988@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Mail-Followup-To: gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <20051102181756.GB979@adacore.com> <200511022334.jA2NYv39004939@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200511022334.jA2NYv39004939@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i X-SW-Source: 2005-11/txt/msg00092.txt.bz2 On Nov 3 00:34, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 10:17:56 -0800 > > From: Joel Brobecker > > > > Just as a sanity check before creating the 6.4 branch, I ran the > > gdb_mbuild.sh script. Here are the results: > > > > * Build fails, but succeeds if we remove -Werror: > > arm-elf: compile failed > > avr: compile failed > > frv-elf: compile failed > > h8300-elf: compile failed > > ia64-linux-gnu: compile failed > > m32r-elf: compile failed > > m68hc11-elf: compile failed > > mips-elf: compile failed > > sh-elf: compile failed > > v850-elf: compile failed > > This is an interresting list. It might be a bit biased by the version > of GCC used by Joel, but it either means that these targets aren't > properly maintained, or that its maintainer needs to be educated about > -Werror. Or perhaps we should enable -Werror by default on the main > branch. Anyway, we should consider these targets aa candidates for > removal after 6.4. I don't think so at all. The -Werror results are just due to the usage of gdb_byte and I don't think that qualifies for treating these targets as broken. It only means that nobody touched the targets after the gdb_byte change has been introduced, but that doesn't invalidate the targets as a whole. This point of view is somewhat excessive, IMHO. FWIW, I'll have a look into h8300-elf, sh-elf and v850-elf at one point, but the change is very likely only mechanical and could have been done by everybody who has build these targets lately. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Cygwin Project Co-Leader Red Hat, Inc.