From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30775 invoked by alias); 5 Nov 2005 02:51:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 30766 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Nov 2005 02:51:01 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Nov 2005 02:51:01 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1EYE8x-0005Vg-ND; Fri, 04 Nov 2005 21:50:59 -0500 Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2005 02:51:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Andrew STUBBS Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFC: GDB as a loader 3/3: --eval-command option Message-ID: <20051105025059.GB20989@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew STUBBS , gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <4354DD31.3020809@st.com> <436B4B87.1060801@st.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <436B4B87.1060801@st.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-SW-Source: 2005-11/txt/msg00117.txt.bz2 On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 11:52:39AM +0000, Andrew STUBBS wrote: > Andrew Stubbs wrote: > >Hi all, > > > >The attached patch implements a new option --eval-command (-ex for > >short) which works similarly to the --command option except that it > >passes the command itself, rather than a file name containing commands. > > May I commit this and the doc patch, please? The code patch is OK with me (wish I'd done this instead of messing around with mktemp last month). I believe Eli is OK with your revised documentation, but please give him a chance to confirm that before you commit. Should this, or the others, be in NEWS? -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC