From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8938 invoked by alias); 13 Nov 2005 17:38:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 8892 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Nov 2005 17:38:05 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Sun, 13 Nov 2005 17:38:05 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1EbLnl-0000eY-GE; Sun, 13 Nov 2005 12:38:01 -0500 Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 17:38:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Andrew STUBBS Cc: Eli Zaretskii , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFC: GDB as a loader 3/3: --eval-command option Message-ID: <20051113173801.GE1945@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew STUBBS , Eli Zaretskii , gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <4354DD31.3020809@st.com> <436B4B87.1060801@st.com> <20051105025059.GB20989@nevyn.them.org> <436F610C.5080508@st.com> <437085AF.9080602@st.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <437085AF.9080602@st.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-SW-Source: 2005-11/txt/msg00248.txt.bz2 On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 11:02:07AM +0000, Andrew STUBBS wrote: > Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >>Should I add a 6.5 section for my changes? > > > > > >Only if we decide not to commit them to the branch as well. > >Personally, I don't see why not have them in 6.4, they cannot possibly > >harm anything. > > Anybody object to my putting --return-child-result (including the header > file update) and --eval-command into 6.4? > > Anybody else in favour? Sounds reasonable to me. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC