From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-23272-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 5143 invoked by alias); 17 Nov 2005 06:47:25 -0000
Received: (qmail 5135 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Nov 2005 06:47:22 -0000
Received: from nile.gnat.com (HELO nile.gnat.com) (205.232.38.5)
    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 06:47:22 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by filtered-nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8782648CEC7;
	Thu, 17 Nov 2005 01:47:20 -0500 (EST)
Received: from nile.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (nile.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP
 id 08969-01-5; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 01:47:20 -0500 (EST)
Received: from takamaka.act-europe.fr (s142-179-108-108.bc.hsia.telus.net [142.179.108.108])
	by nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 294D148CEC3;
	Thu, 17 Nov 2005 01:47:20 -0500 (EST)
Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 507)
	id 37F0147E79; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 22:47:15 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 06:47:00 -0000
From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
To: Andrew STUBBS <andrew.stubbs@st.com>,
	GDB List <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Version number
Message-ID: <20051117064715.GC1635@adacore.com>
References: <4379D71F.1050801@st.com> <20051117040602.GB3513@nevyn.them.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20051117040602.GB3513@nevyn.them.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2005-11/txt/msg00342.txt.bz2

> > Is this correct? Should it not now be 6.4.something?
> 
> Yes, it should be.  There's a sentence about this in the Releasing GDB
> manual, but it's a bit confusing, so I'm not surprised it gets
> overlooked from time to time...
> 
> I have committed the obvious change to bump HEAD to 6.4.50.

OK. I was waiting for somebody to confirm. I had actually spotted
this inconsistency in the manual, but wasn't sure, thinking that
maybe [...].

Anyway, I'll take care of updating the procedure in the manual.

-- 
Joel