From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31000 invoked by alias); 19 Nov 2005 22:25:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 30981 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Nov 2005 22:25:07 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from cgf.cx (HELO cgf.cx) (24.61.23.223) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 22:25:07 +0000 Received: by cgf.cx (Postfix, from userid 201) id C774B13C545; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 17:25:05 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 22:25:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Maintainer policy for GDB Message-ID: <20051119222505.GC13034@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Mail-Followup-To: gdb@sourceware.org References: <20051117231020.GJ1635@adacore.com> <200511180956.14917.pgilliam@us.ibm.com> <20051119024455.GA6482@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <20051119170458.GB7912@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <20051119222130.GA13034@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <20051119222309.GB13034@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051119222309.GB13034@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2005-11/txt/msg00429.txt.bz2 On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 05:23:09PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 05:21:30PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 09:39:33PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >>>Unfortunately, it doesn't seem to work. For example, the message I'm >>>replying to came without the X-IsSubscribed header, although I'm quite >>>sure you are a subscriber. I did see that header on a message I sent >>>myself; is it possible that you only arranged for this header on the >>>message reflected back to the sender? >> >>That's what I meant by saying that this method not foolproof. My sender >>address does not match my subscription address. >> >>Again, this is not a foolproof way of figuring out if someone is not >>subscribed but it should be a foolproof way of figuring out if someone >>is subscribed, i.e., if you see the header then the sender is definitely >>subscribed. If you don't see the header then the person may or may not >>be subscribed, depending on how they sent the software. >> >>That said, however, I just modified the software to check the header from >>as well as the envelope sender. Maybe this email will show up with the >>X-IsSubscribed header set. > >Nope. Oh well. That's better. cgf