From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc: Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>, GDB <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: ARM RDI
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 14:12:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051129134436.GA22387@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1133259214.32658.36.camel@pc960.cambridge.arm.com>
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 10:13:34AM +0000, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 23:15, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> > In my quest to make things build on Windows, I see that ARM GDB doesn't
> > quite build for Windows do the fact that rdi-share doesn't build without
> > angeldll.h. However, rdi-share does still build on GNU/Linux, where
> > rdi-share isn't required.
> >
> > Since RDI has been declared obsolete by ARM, and since the version in
> > GDB is even more obsolete than that, I'm not sure that there's much
> > point in continuing to try to support RDI.
> >
> > There seem to be several options, ordered, IMHO, from best to worst.
> >
> > 1) Remove rdi-share from GDB entirely.
>
> I think this one is probably best now... I discussed it with Andrew at
> the Summit and we agreed it was the way to go. But like dejagnu removal
> it's taking a long time to finally do it...
Does anyone object? If not, let's just do it.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-29 13:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-29 3:14 Mark Mitchell
2005-11-29 12:01 ` Richard Earnshaw
2005-11-29 14:12 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2005-11-29 14:20 ` Simon Richter
2005-11-29 14:27 ` Richard Earnshaw
2005-11-29 17:54 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-11-29 18:03 ` Mark Mitchell
2005-11-29 18:33 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-11-29 18:52 ` Mark Mitchell
2005-12-09 17:24 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-12-09 17:51 ` Simon Richter
2005-12-09 21:14 ` Stan Shebs
2005-11-29 18:49 ` Jim Blandy
2005-11-29 19:20 ` Mark Mitchell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051129134436.GA22387@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=mark@codesourcery.com \
--cc=rearnsha@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).