From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7999 invoked by alias); 9 Dec 2005 17:24:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 7972 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Dec 2005 17:24:20 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 17:23:52 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1EklyF-0004CW-Pd; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 12:23:47 -0500 Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 17:24:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Mark Mitchell , Simon Richter , Richard Earnshaw , GDB Subject: Re: ARM RDI Message-ID: <20051209172347.GA16076@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Mark Mitchell , Simon Richter , Richard Earnshaw , GDB References: <438B8FAD.1020804@codesourcery.com> <1133259214.32658.36.camel@pc960.cambridge.arm.com> <20051129134436.GA22387@nevyn.them.org> <438C6192.10109@hogyros.de> <20051129142714.GA23172@nevyn.them.org> <438C95BF.10109@codesourcery.com> <20051129180326.GA29028@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051129180326.GA29028@nevyn.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2005-12/txt/msg00099.txt.bz2 On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 01:03:26PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 09:54:07AM -0800, Mark Mitchell wrote: > > Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > > > > There are a number of other ways to use RDI besides rdi-share. > > > > Indeed. > > > > Some of the board vendors also ship GDB<->RDI converters. As you say, I > > have very little confidence that the current rdi-share actually works > > with most things. > > > > If consensus has been reached to remove rdi-share, may I post a patch > > for review? Or, if we don't think we can get that consensus, how about > > at least a patch to make it a configure-time option, off by default? > > Consensus can't be reached in one day :-) > > Let's come back to this next week, please. Only Simon objected, and I haven't seen a reply to either Richard's or my responses to him. Richard (the ARM port maintainer) and Andrew (second-hand via Richard) were in favor. Anyone else have comments? Otherwise, next week I intend to remove the rdi-share subdirectory and its supporting code. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC