From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27296 invoked by alias); 27 Feb 2006 16:33:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 27270 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Feb 2006 16:33:22 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 16:33:21 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1FDlJG-0005Ph-Pw; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 11:33:18 -0500 Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 02:54:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Wu Zhou Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: New Fortran test failures Message-ID: <20060227163318.GA20782@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Wu Zhou , gdb@sourceware.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-02/txt/msg00325.txt.bz2 Hi Wu, Have you run the GDB testsuite lately? I don't have before-and-after results, but it looks like your recent Fortran patch caused extra whitespace after printing certain Fortran types, which shows up as failures in gdb.fortran/types.exp. I'm not sure why. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery