Re: gdb support for m32c?

[Hans-Wolfgang Loidl <hwloidl@informatik.uni-muenchen.de>]

Hi Daniel,

Thanks for the swift reply. 
I now checked out the HEAD of the gdb cvs rep with the m32c code in
sim. Does "not supported yet" mean that the simulator itself doesn't
work, or just that some GDB features don't work, yet?
As said, at the moment I'd only need the simulator, and I'd happy
with a version even if it's still a bit unstable.

If not, any comments how close that would be to completion? We just
started work on a project that still goes at least 2 years, so we could
plan things around a rough timeplan.

Cheers,
--
 HW

On Wed, 8 Mar 2006 22:24:49 -0500
Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 11:11:33PM +0100, Hans-Wolfgang Loidl wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > The GCC readinglist claims that GDB includes a simulator
> > for the m32c processor.
> > However, downloading the latest gdb snapshot I only found
> > a dir m32r (the RISC rather than CISC version) in the
> > sim/ dir.
> > 
> > Can somebody enlighten me whether GDB does support the
> > m32c, and if so how to include support for it, so that I can
> > at least use it as simulator for GCC generated m32c-elf 
> > binaries.
> 
> The latest CVS version of GDB does include the m32c simulator;
> you may have been looking at an older release branch snapshot.
> However, GDB doesn't yet have an m32c port; I think it got held up in
> review at some point, but I don't remember.
> 
> -- 
> Daniel Jacobowitz
> CodeSourcery