From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12481 invoked by alias); 10 Mar 2006 22:45:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 12469 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Mar 2006 22:45:19 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from coltrane.tcs.informatik.uni-muenchen.de (HELO coltrane.tcs.informatik.uni-muenchen.de) (129.187.228.100) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 22:45:16 +0000 Received: from tcs.informatik.uni-muenchen.de (aquila.tcs.ifi.lmu.de [141.84.9.37]) by coltrane.tcs.informatik.uni-muenchen.de (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with SMTP id IVXOJC00.L1D; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 23:45:12 +0100 Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 22:45:00 -0000 From: Hans-Wolfgang Loidl To: DJ Delorie Cc: gdb@sourceware.org, drow@false.org Subject: Re: gdb support for m32c? Message-ID: <20060310234511.7b55e761@anagni.tcs.ifi.lmu.de> In-Reply-To: <200603102130.k2ALUJ3M004786@greed.delorie.com> References: <200603102130.k2ALUJ3M004786@greed.delorie.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-03/txt/msg00055.txt.bz2 Hi DJ, In the meantime I managed to build the m32c simulator from the CVS HEAD, and with that version I can now run simple C programs, and also some programs compiled via C from out high-level language So, I'm a happy user (for now)! I noticed, though, that the simulator can't handle argv input: it gives a null pointer reference. Any patches that you have, and other hints on using it tools etc would be very welcome! Cheers, -- HW On Fri, 10 Mar 2006 16:30:19 -0500 DJ Delorie wrote: > > > > I now checked out the HEAD of the gdb cvs rep with the m32c code > > > in sim. Does "not supported yet" mean that the simulator itself > > > doesn't work, or just that some GDB features don't work, yet? > > > As said, at the moment I'd only need the simulator, and I'd happy > > > with a version even if it's still a bit unstable. > > > > The simulator should be fine, as far as I know. > > Alas, it needs some patches, although they're minor. I use the > simulator a LOT so it's fairly stable. > > I missed that the m32c sim had been approved. I'm supposed to be the > m32c sim maintainer but Jim didn't add me as part of the commit > process. How to proceed? > > Also, while I can get the simulator to build, it currently doesn't get > that far because it has a dependency on gdb being at least configured, > which doesn't happen yet. That's why I didn't notice my builds > suddenly including the simulator :-P