From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6534 invoked by alias); 14 Mar 2006 02:23:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 6523 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Mar 2006 02:23:54 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Mar 2006 02:23:53 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1FIzCQ-0000LG-Iw; Mon, 13 Mar 2006 21:23:50 -0500 Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 02:23:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: DJ Delorie Cc: gdb@sourceware.org, hwloidl@informatik.uni-muenchen.de Subject: Re: gdb support for m32c? Message-ID: <20060314022350.GA1097@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: DJ Delorie , gdb@sourceware.org, hwloidl@informatik.uni-muenchen.de References: <200603102130.k2ALUJ3M004786@greed.delorie.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200603102130.k2ALUJ3M004786@greed.delorie.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-03/txt/msg00060.txt.bz2 On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 04:30:19PM -0500, DJ Delorie wrote: > Alas, it needs some patches, although they're minor. I use the > simulator a LOT so it's fairly stable. > > I missed that the m32c sim had been approved. I'm supposed to be the > m32c sim maintainer but Jim didn't add me as part of the commit > process. How to proceed? I don't know. I vaguely remember this coming up when the patch was submitted; ah, there was some confusion about whether there was already an m32c port and it was already yours. If you want maintainership of this sim, I don't think anyone will object; could you add yourself to sim/MAINTAINERS? > Also, while I can get the simulator to build, it currently doesn't get > that far because it has a dependency on gdb being at least configured, > which doesn't happen yet. That's why I didn't notice my builds > suddenly including the simulator :-P It'd be nice to get the GDB port finalized, one way or another. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery