From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26575 invoked by alias); 12 Oct 2007 14:04:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 26530 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Oct 2007 14:04:56 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 14:04:49 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CFC9981F3; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 14:04:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBA6C981F2; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 14:04:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1IgL8A-0002aE-RK; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 10:04:46 -0400 Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 14:04:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Ralf Corsepius , gdb@sourceware.org, Chris Johns , Joel Sherrill Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] GDB 6.7 released! Message-ID: <20071012140446.GA9907@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Joel Brobecker , Ralf Corsepius , gdb@sourceware.org, Chris Johns , Joel Sherrill References: <1192103366.3058.73.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <20071011121401.GB9944@caradoc.them.org> <1192110836.3058.78.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <20071011140415.GA16939@caradoc.them.org> <20071011155036.GF6029@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071011155036.GF6029@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-10/txt/msg00081.txt.bz2 On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 08:50:36AM -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote: > > > # makeinfo --version > > > makeinfo (GNU texinfo) 4.11 > > > > Someone else filed a PR about this last night. It's fixed on trunk. > > Joel, what do you think we should do? Just document it? > > Can we also put the fix on the branch for later on, when we produce > the 6.7.1? I have just applied Alan's fix to the branch. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery