From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-29934-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 18390 invoked by alias); 18 Oct 2007 19:30:35 -0000
Received: (qmail 18380 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Oct 2007 19:30:34 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from new-tully.CS.Berkeley.EDU (HELO new-tully.CS.Berkeley.EDU) (128.32.153.206)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Oct 2007 19:30:30 +0000
Received: from new-tully.CS.Berkeley.EDU (localhost [127.0.0.1]) 	by new-tully.CS.Berkeley.EDU (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l9IJULS2008659; 	Thu, 18 Oct 2007 12:30:22 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <200710181930.l9IJULS2008659@new-tully.CS.Berkeley.EDU>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
cc: Douglas Evans <dje@google.com>, gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: print/x on references
Reply-To: Hilfinger@CS.Berkeley.EDU
In-reply-to: Your message of Thu, 18 Oct 2007 15:21:03 -0400.              <20071018192103.GA31401@caradoc.them.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <8655.1192735821.1@new-tully.CS.Berkeley.EDU>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 19:30:00 -0000
From: Paul Hilfinger <hilfingr@new-tully.CS.Berkeley.EDU>
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2007-10/txt/msg00154.txt.bz2


> Either of you want to write us some testcases for the testsuite?

Sure, and I can also submit a patch to current behavior (since I
opened this particular can).  Shall we test p/x &(&c) as well as p/x c
and p/x &c (and the analogous Ada cases, which are identical except
for syntax)?

PNH