From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Problems while debugging fortran
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 19:01:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071025190150.GA1560@caradoc.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3lk9rxceq.fsf@codesourcery.com>
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 11:43:57AM -0700, Jim Blandy wrote:
> To be clear: I think the actual code in Carlos's patch is just fine.
> The comment, though, should not say things that are simply untrue.
> Which is why I suggested a new comment, instead of rejecting the
> patch. Whether or not we like the state of DWARF in this regard, the
> comment should correct describes the state of play, no?
However, the Fortran main program receives its arguments via a
special calling convention
I don't think that's true. As far as I know it has a perfectly
ordinary calling convention.
As for Carlos's comment, I don't know if it's true or not, but
it certainly seems to be what everyone else interprets the
DWARF standard to suggest :-)
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-25 19:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-25 16:07 François-Xavier Coudert
2007-10-25 17:06 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-10-25 18:44 ` Jim Blandy
2007-10-25 19:01 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2007-10-25 19:27 ` Jim Blandy
2007-10-25 20:24 ` Joel Brobecker
2007-10-25 20:36 ` Carlos Eduardo Seo
2007-10-25 20:41 ` Joel Brobecker
[not found] ` <4721034D.2060502@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2007-11-13 17:45 ` Problems while debugging fortran -- DWARF Michael Eager
2007-10-25 20:55 ` Problems while debugging fortran Andreas Schwab
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-09-15 11:37 Carlos Eduardo Seo
2007-09-20 19:47 ` Joel Brobecker
2007-09-20 20:46 ` Carlos Eduardo Seo
2007-09-20 20:56 ` Joel Brobecker
2007-09-21 6:52 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-09-26 21:46 ` Carlos Eduardo Seo
2007-09-26 21:51 ` Pierre Muller
2007-09-26 21:51 ` Joel Brobecker
2007-10-24 16:20 ` Carlos Eduardo Seo
2007-10-24 19:33 ` Joel Brobecker
2007-10-24 19:57 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-10-24 20:16 ` Carlos Eduardo Seo
2007-10-24 21:56 ` Carlos Eduardo Seo
2007-09-23 2:52 ` Carlos Eduardo Seo
2007-09-24 10:01 ` Joel Brobecker
2007-09-24 23:49 ` Carlos Eduardo Seo
2007-09-25 1:29 ` Joel Brobecker
2007-09-25 17:34 ` Carlos Eduardo Seo
2007-09-26 6:29 ` Joel Brobecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071025190150.GA1560@caradoc.them.org \
--to=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).