From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18478 invoked by alias); 8 Nov 2007 16:33:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 18470 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Nov 2007 16:33:37 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Nov 2007 16:33:31 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BE9098353; Thu, 8 Nov 2007 16:33:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BEF998258; Thu, 8 Nov 2007 16:33:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1IqAJs-00013b-7L; Thu, 08 Nov 2007 11:33:28 -0500 Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2007 16:33:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Bobo Cc: Thiago Jung Bauermann , gdb Subject: Re: Breakpoint in C++ class constructor is never reached Message-ID: <20071108163328.GA4047@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Bobo , Thiago Jung Bauermann , gdb References: <1193857525.5787.258.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1194379922.6746.19.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1194467626.6746.50.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1194533921.6746.54.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20071108150514.GA30051@caradoc.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-11/txt/msg00060.txt.bz2 On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 06:29:31PM +0200, Bobo wrote: > Daniel, do i understand correctly that there will be no 6.7.5 release of gdb? > Is it correct that the next official release (with my issues solved) is planned > for Feb 2008? It depends if one is necessary for enough reasons. The next branch release would be 6.7.2. The kdevelop fix may mean we need one. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery