From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-30188-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 18119 invoked by alias); 13 Nov 2007 19:59:43 -0000
Received: (qmail 18111 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Nov 2007 19:59:42 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 19:59:40 +0000
Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) 	by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A1599835E; 	Tue, 13 Nov 2007 19:59:38 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) 	by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2182D98349; 	Tue, 13 Nov 2007 19:59:37 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.68) 	(envelope-from <drow@caradoc.them.org>) 	id 1Is1v6-0004Ml-Es; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 14:59:36 -0500
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 19:59:00 -0000
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Vladimir Prus <ghost@cs.msu.su>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Multiple breakpoint locations
Message-ID: <20071113195936.GA16718@caradoc.them.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Vladimir Prus <ghost@cs.msu.su>, gdb@sources.redhat.com
References: <18233.63439.953202.586908@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <fhctsf$94f$1@ger.gmane.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <fhctsf$94f$1@ger.gmane.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2007-11/txt/msg00100.txt.bz2

On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 10:28:15PM +0300, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> > 3) I created this breakpoint by specifying the line but if I do:
> > 
> >     b foo<int>()
> > 
> >    or any variant I can think of, I just get a pending breakpoint as GDB
> >    doesn't recognise the location.  Can such locations be specified on the
> >    command line by name?
> 
> Does
> 
>         b 'void foo<int>()'
> 
> work better?

I have some patches in progress which should make 'break foo<int>'
work.  I posted one of them a month or so ago; I have not committed it
yet, because I was disappointed by the performance cost, but I can't
think of any real alternatives.  So I probably will commit it soon
and then finish the other patches.

I've gotten caught up in another project at the moment, though, so
not right away.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery