From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 420 invoked by alias); 13 Nov 2007 20:14:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 412 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Nov 2007 20:14:28 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 20:14:26 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE07B9835E; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 20:14:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAAF798349; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 20:14:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1Is29Q-0004hI-1W; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 15:14:24 -0500 Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 20:14:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Nick Roberts Cc: Vladimir Prus , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Multiple breakpoint locations Message-ID: <20071113201424.GA17850@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Nick Roberts , Vladimir Prus , gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <18233.63439.953202.586908@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <18234.1121.556841.49775@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <18234.1121.556841.49775@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-11/txt/msg00102.txt.bz2 On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 09:09:05AM +1300, Nick Roberts wrote: > Yes, thanks. It seems strange to me that the return type needs to be > specified. I thought with overloading, people talked about signature which > is determined by the name and arguments but not the return type. It's a quirk of the way C++ gnuv3 mangling works. I get someone to explain to me why the return type is included about once a year, and then promptly forget again. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery