From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17273 invoked by alias); 30 Nov 2007 01:14:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 17265 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Nov 2007 01:14:22 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 30 Nov 2007 01:14:18 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 631C92A97FF; Thu, 29 Nov 2007 20:14:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id xaiaYoCbWkTY; Thu, 29 Nov 2007 20:14:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 200AB2A97FE; Thu, 29 Nov 2007 20:14:16 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B3D60E7ACA; Thu, 29 Nov 2007 17:14:13 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 01:14:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Vladimir Prus Cc: Michael Snyder , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Questionable breakpoint stepping code Message-ID: <20071130011413.GA10585@adacore.com> References: <20071127135405.GA3820@caradoc.them.org> <20071127193243.GB3620@adacore.com> <200711291535.36950.vladimir@codesourcery.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200711291535.36950.vladimir@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-11/txt/msg00281.txt.bz2 > > I have been away for a week and I still a bit overwhelmed by my email > > backlog that caused me to miss the patch. But if Volodya sends me the > > patch again, I'll give it a whirl. > > Thanks Joel! > Here's the patch. Thanks. I don't know why, but somehow, the patch didn't apply cleanly to HEAD, so I applied it manually. The results were identical after applying and I double-checked that the error never triggered. -- Joel