From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24521 invoked by alias); 7 Dec 2007 00:42:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 24507 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Dec 2007 00:42:35 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Dec 2007 00:42:29 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA5DD982D9; Fri, 7 Dec 2007 00:42:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C29C498150; Fri, 7 Dec 2007 00:42:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1J0RIQ-0007wr-96; Thu, 06 Dec 2007 19:42:26 -0500 Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2007 00:42:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb@sourceware.org, personel personel , gdb-patches Subject: Re: Debugging a Vlc dll with GDB. Message-ID: <20071207004226.GA30430@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Pedro Alves , gdb@sourceware.org, personel personel , gdb-patches References: <20071206182343.GA16137@caradoc.them.org> <433908.24398.qm@web57701.mail.re3.yahoo.com> <20071206202850.GA27429@caradoc.them.org> <47586224.CE80C330@dessent.net> <475893BA.8000700@portugalmail.pt> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <475893BA.8000700@portugalmail.pt> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-12/txt/msg00055.txt.bz2 On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 12:28:42AM +0000, Pedro Alves wrote: > I could swear there use to be a "pending resolved" > notice. Did it go away with the multiple breakpoint > location support? Yes, I believe so. It was mostly there to warn you that the breakpoint number had changed, which Vladimir has now fixed. > if (pending_break_support == AUTO_BOOLEAN_AUTO && > - !nquery ("Make breakpoint pending on future shared library load? ")) > + !nquery (_("\ > +Make breakpoint pending on future symbol file addition? "))) Accurate, but I don't like it much... sounds awkward. For the rest, I don't really like the churn on messages; would it work to just push the error down below *not_found_ptr = 1, and make it a NOT_FOUND_ERROR? -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery