public inbox for gdb@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@codesourcery.com>
To: Andrew Stubbs <ams@codesourcery.com>
Cc: gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: debug problem with prelinked libraries
Date: Wed, 05 May 2010 14:35:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100505143213.GA4735@caradoc.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BE16915.7080501@codesourcery.com>

On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 01:48:21PM +0100, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I'm trying to get to the bottom of a problem debugging prelinked
> libraries. I've fixed a few aspects of the problem, but the further I
> get into it the more I think I must be missing something. I mean,
> debugging prelinked libraries is supposed to Just Work, right? But I
> can't see how it could ever have worked.

It definitely works.  GDB is even supposed to automatically handle
libraries that are prelinked to a different location on disk than they
were at runtime, although that's relatively recent, IIRC.

> Upon closer inspection, I find that the psymtab has the textlow and
> texthigh addresses as the original file-offsets, before relocation.
> This appears to be because it calculates the section offset as the
> difference between the actual address and the ELF VMA, but the file
> is prelinked, so the offset is zero, and the debug info and symbols
> are then not relocated.

What do you mean by "before relocation"?

Are the libraries used to create the core dump prelinked in exactly
the same way as the libraries on the host during debug, or not?  It
should work either way, but they're different cases.

If both libraries are identically prelinked, then I would have
expected the prelinked libraries to not require relocation.  prelink
includes code to manipulate the contents of the debug info.

I don't know if prelink follows things across to separate debug info
files.  It doesn't look like it.  So if you have that, too, then the
separate debug info file should be treated as a not-prelinked copy of
the shared library.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery

  reply	other threads:[~2010-05-05 14:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-05 12:48 Andrew Stubbs
2010-05-05 14:35 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2010-05-05 14:59   ` Andrew Stubbs
2010-05-07 13:23     ` Jan Kratochvil
2010-05-07 13:26       ` Andrew Stubbs
2010-07-01 15:43       ` Thomas Schwinge
2010-07-06  9:59         ` MIPS: 64-bit DWARF (was: debug problem with prelinked libraries) Thomas Schwinge
2010-07-14  8:50           ` MIPS: 64-bit DWARF Thomas Schwinge
2010-07-14 16:56             ` David Daney
2010-07-14 18:44               ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2010-07-15 15:48                 ` Tom Tromey
2010-07-16 14:44                   ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2010-07-21 22:54                   ` Joseph S. Myers
2010-07-22  5:28                     ` Tom Tromey
2010-07-16 11:22                 ` Thomas Schwinge
2010-07-19 20:00             ` Richard Sandiford
2010-07-22  7:41               ` Thomas Schwinge

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100505143213.GA4735@caradoc.them.org \
    --to=dan@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=ams@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).