From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13343 invoked by alias); 7 Jul 2010 12:30:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 13323 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Jul 2010 12:30:48 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtagate5.de.ibm.com (HELO mtagate5.de.ibm.com) (195.212.17.165) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Jul 2010 12:30:40 +0000 Received: from d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.167.49]) by mtagate5.de.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o67CUbUF016249; Wed, 7 Jul 2010 12:30:37 GMT Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.165.228]) by d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id o67CUbwZ1761318; Wed, 7 Jul 2010 14:30:37 +0200 Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id o67CUb6n029286; Wed, 7 Jul 2010 14:30:37 +0200 Received: from tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com [9.152.85.9]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with SMTP id o67CUZYU029252; Wed, 7 Jul 2010 14:30:35 +0200 Message-Id: <201007071230.o67CUZYU029252@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> Received: by tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 07 Jul 2010 14:30:35 +0200 Subject: Re: support biarch gcore? To: mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl (Mark Kettenis) Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2010 12:30:00 -0000 From: "Ulrich Weigand" Cc: jan.kratochvil@redhat.com, Jon.Zhou@jdsu.com, gdb@sourceware.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <201007062128.o66LSkNC032580@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> from "Mark Kettenis" at Jul 06, 2010 11:28:46 PM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-07/txt/msg00020.txt.bz2 Mark Kettenis wrote: > > Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 22:48:44 +0200 (CEST) > > From: "Ulrich Weigand" > > > > Unfortunately, it also turned out that the section sizes provided for > > .reg in those targets that have gdbarch_core_regset_sections, while > > currently unused, were also nearly all wrong ... > > > > The following patch fixes those sizes, and changes linux-nat.c to > > use them. > Although I don't feel qualified to judge the powerpc bits, this makes > quite a bit of sense to me. And yes, the value for amd64-linux is > obviously wrong. OK, thanks! I've checked the patch in now. Bye, Ulrich -- Dr. Ulrich Weigand GNU Toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell BE Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com