From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5190 invoked by alias); 2 Aug 2010 18:17:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 5179 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Aug 2010 18:17:45 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from bromo.med.uc.edu (HELO bromo.med.uc.edu) (129.137.3.146) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with SMTP; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 18:17:02 +0000 Received: from bromo.med.uc.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by bromo.med.uc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAB10B005C; Mon, 2 Aug 2010 14:17:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from howarth@localhost) by bromo.med.uc.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o72IH0PR023191; Mon, 2 Aug 2010 14:17:00 -0400 Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2010 18:17:00 -0000 From: Jack Howarth To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Michael Snyder , "gdb@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: GDB 7.2 release date Message-ID: <20100802181700.GA23164@bromo.med.uc.edu> References: <20100728175011.GB7907@adacore.com> <201007281902.02965.pedro@codesourcery.com> <20100728220201.GG7907@adacore.com> <4C56F9C2.9050300@vmware.com> <20100802172700.GE20947@adacore.com> <20100802173738.GA22911@bromo.med.uc.edu> <20100802173958.GF20947@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100802173958.GF20947@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-08/txt/msg00016.txt.bz2 On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 10:39:58AM -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote: > > I posted the testresults for the current 7.2 release snapshot > > on http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-testers/2010-q3/msg00000.html for > > x86_64-apple-darwin10. How do those results compare with x86_64-*-linux? > > I could run the testsuite on my system and send you the results if you > would like to compare. Typically, though, linux systems enjoy much > better results that darwin. Joel, Better yet could you just post the results to gdb-testers? I was surprised to see that there isn't the same sort of regress testers running to post regularly to that list like on FSF gcc. Jack > > -- > Joel