From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19170 invoked by alias); 7 Aug 2010 13:24:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 19149 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Aug 2010 13:24:55 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl) (83.163.83.176) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 Aug 2010 13:24:52 +0000 Received: from glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o77DNNkF012824; Sat, 7 Aug 2010 15:23:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from kettenis@localhost) by glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o77DNKU9006591; Sat, 7 Aug 2010 15:23:20 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2010 13:24:00 -0000 Message-Id: <201008071323.o77DNKU9006591@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> From: Mark Kettenis To: dan@codesourcery.com CC: eliz@gnu.org, msnyder@vmware.com, gdb@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <20100807130604.GA20276@caradoc.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Sat, 7 Aug 2010 09:06:09 -0400) Subject: Re: Platforms using COFF? References: <83lj8kw3ep.fsf@gnu.org> <4C5C528B.6000304@vmware.com> <837hk2wznp.fsf@gnu.org> <20100807130604.GA20276@caradoc.them.org> Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-08/txt/msg00046.txt.bz2 > Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2010 09:06:09 -0400 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > > On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 12:16:42PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2010 11:20:59 -0700 > > > From: Michael Snyder > > > CC: "gdb@sourceware.org" > > > > > > grep -li coff config/*/* > > > config/djgpp/fnchange.lst > > > config/powerpc/aix.mh > > > config/rs6000/nm-rs6000.h > > > > Thanks. Other than DJGPP, these are for AIX, I believe. If that's > > true, then AIX uses XCOFF, which seems to be already covered by > > unexaix.c in Emacs. > > > > Does anyone know which of the platforms hinted by bfd/coff-FOO.c are > > still in widespread use? > > Some of them are in use - but I'd be amazed if any of them ran emacs > :-) You might want to check whether any of the NetBSD/OpenBSD > platforms are COFF, but I don't think so. We (OpenBSD) have a few a.out platforms left (vax, m68k, m88k). All the others are ELF. I believe NetBSD has been ELF-only for a while. I believe we have a COFF bootloader for older PowerPC Macs, but I doubt anybody will try to run emacs in that environment ;).