From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16281 invoked by alias); 16 Aug 2010 19:17:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 16272 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Aug 2010 19:17:53 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 19:17:48 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70A7F2BABB0; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 15:17:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id sOwuTLaRz0Jx; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 15:17:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39E0F2BAB9A; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 15:17:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 29CB9F58F9; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 12:17:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 19:17:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Stan Shebs Cc: Pedro Alves , gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: GDB 7.2 release date Message-ID: <20100816191743.GB3509@adacore.com> References: <20100728175011.GB7907@adacore.com> <201007291514.01249.pedro@codesourcery.com> <20100816151513.GA13566@adacore.com> <201008161620.53864.pedro@codesourcery.com> <4C6960B3.30101@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4C6960B3.30101@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-08/txt/msg00097.txt.bz2 > I can certainly take care of the observer mode part at least. Thanks! Anything else we think might have slipped in without the necessary NEWS update? Apart from pure ChangeLog review, can we verify this by just comparing the documentation changes vs the NEWS files changes? (this assumes that all new packets were documented, is that correct). On my end, I will look at the -file-list-exec-source-files tomorrow (BTW: I'm in Europe for the next 10 days), if no one else has a chance to look at it by then. -- Joel