From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-39218-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 3059 invoked by alias); 17 May 2011 12:03:23 -0000
Received: (qmail 3051 invoked by uid 22791); 17 May 2011 12:03:22 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (38.113.113.100)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 12:03:09 +0000
Received: (qmail 27566 invoked from network); 17 May 2011 12:03:08 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO scottsdale.localnet) (pedro@127.0.0.2)  by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 17 May 2011 12:03:08 -0000
From: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
To: gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Stepping of multithreaded application
Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 12:03:00 -0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.35-28-generic; KDE/4.6.2; x86_64; ; )
Cc: Tomas Martinec <fyzmat@gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTimdW6nk=7LA0QLEFk8PbahskcDcUQ@mail.gmail.com> <201105161217.37184.pedro@codesourcery.com> <BANLkTik=Nq-R+_B-ga0W2c1VZDX1DjStvA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTik=Nq-R+_B-ga0W2c1VZDX1DjStvA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201105171303.06804.pedro@codesourcery.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-05/txt/msg00079.txt.bz2

On Monday 16 May 2011 16:22:49, Tomas Martinec wrote:
> > I imagine you're seeing a 'Hc1', 'c', and only continuing
> > thread 1 instead of all threads?
> 
> Yes, that is right.

Hmm.  This is making me very nervous on changing GDB's
age old behavior...  Who knows which old targets out
there are assuming:

- "Hc 0" to mean continue all threads
- "Hc $FOO" to continue/step only thread $FOO

and picking the 's' (step) thread from the previous Hg ?

I fear we'd be switching from one broken behavior to
another.  Since new stubs can just vCont, I'm now
inclined to leave things as is.

> > I'll test and apply your fix if nothing turns up regardless.
> 
> Please let me know if you find a problem with the fix.

I've applied this fix.  Thanks.

-- 
Pedro Alves