From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18019 invoked by alias); 12 Dec 2011 21:09:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 18008 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Dec 2011 21:09:21 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 21:09:08 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pBCL97f6014115 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 12 Dec 2011 16:09:07 -0500 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-39.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.39]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pBCL93J9019506 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 12 Dec 2011 16:09:05 -0500 Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 21:09:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: t cheney Cc: gdb Subject: Re: Fwd: [PATCH 1/1] x86: Add process memory layout to coredump file Message-ID: <20111212210902.GB29248@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-12/txt/msg00019.txt.bz2 On Sun, 11 Dec 2011 15:15:16 +0100, t cheney wrote: > This is readelf's patch which can retrieve maps in coredump > file, and it is based on binutils-2.21.1. This patch should therefore has been sent to (and not to ). FYI has ongoing discussion about accesing this mapping information by GDB: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2011-12/msg00018.html (the whole thread plus previous months) Before posting to please verify it applies to binutils HEAD. Plus I could not apply your patch as it was line-wrapped. Regards, Jan