From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7871 invoked by alias); 9 Feb 2012 14:03:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 7858 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Feb 2012 14:03:54 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:03:37 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q19E3ZnR010585 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 9 Feb 2012 09:03:35 -0500 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-26.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.26]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q19E3VdM005823 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 9 Feb 2012 09:03:33 -0500 Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:03:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Phil Muldoon Cc: gdb@sourceware.org, dnovillo@google.com, Cary Coutant , Mark Wielaard Subject: Re: GDB Talks at the GNU Cauldron Message-ID: <20120209140330.GA12146@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <4F32DAC8.8020408@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F32DAC8.8020408@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-02/txt/msg00024.txt.bz2 On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:27:52 +0100, Phil Muldoon wrote: > According to the organizers there are three to four talks at the > Cauldron. Something that Diego mentioned was the need to coordinate > talks. So, who has submitted abstracts, and what are their titles? > It would be good to plan for this. There is also one GDB-related submitted abour DWARF compression (posting with Mark's agreement). As I posted here before one general Roadmap talk of mine (I do not see any such other talk here). Regards, Jan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Title: Reducing DWARF debuginfo size. Authors: Cary Coutant , Mark Wielaard Abstract: Generating, linking, reading and storing DWARF debuginfo take significant resources, time and space. We want to discuss some efforts that have recently been done to reduce some of that in the compiler, linker, package manager and tools, like debuggers, that use the DWARF debug information. We are interested in discussing efforts that worked, the various tradeoffs, efforts that didn't produce significant results and ideas for future DWARF reduction work and/or standardization. Cary Coutant has been working on the Debug Fission project, DWARF Extensions for Separate Debug Information Files: http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/DebugFission Mark Wielaard has been working on the elfutils project, which contains the libdw DWARF consumer library that is used by tools like systemtap and the dwarves tools: https://fedorahosted.org/elfutils/wiki/RoadMap ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Title: GDB Roadmap Authors: Jan Kratochvil Abstract: Status of missing features, status of features being worked on (known to me). Which way to keep unused template methods code separate from the code output. Dynamic types (such as variable length arrays) implementation choices in GDB.