From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5041 invoked by alias); 10 Apr 2012 15:05:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 5027 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Apr 2012 15:05:12 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:04:59 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB8151C656C; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 11:04:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id YfaqgVg66BUr; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 11:04:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 662DD1C6494; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 11:04:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 78769145616; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 08:04:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:05:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Pierre Muller Cc: 'Tom Tromey' , gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: gdb/gnulib problems with BSD operating systems Message-ID: <20120410150453.GH2744@adacore.com> References: <32726.6318876811$1333031278@news.gmane.org> <87ehs9n7xx.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20120330213422.GX2713@adacore.com> <20120330220740.GA18842@adacore.com> <002101cd0f36$ee5b8bc0$cb12a340$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> <24504.7532058836$1333217860@news.gmane.org> <877gxykyjq.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <000301cd1310$8fdaad50$af9007f0$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000301cd1310$8fdaad50$af9007f0$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg00071.txt.bz2 > It is probably related to some recent change in > the top level configure... It seems so indeed. > I have no clue if and how this should be fixed. > Especially as top Makefile contains the lines: > 691-# We leave this in just in case, but it is not needed anymore. > 692:RECURSE_FLAGS_TO_PASS = $(BASE_FLAGS_TO_PASS) The top-level configure is maintained by GCC, so hopefully someone on the GCC list would be able to give us a hint? -- Joel