From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12642 invoked by alias); 12 Apr 2012 17:18:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 12624 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Apr 2012 17:18:13 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 17:18:00 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E9621C6C65; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 13:17:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id mIbp1BT8uPiC; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 13:17:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E9BA1C68B4; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 13:17:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0A510145616; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 10:17:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 17:18:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Paul Smith Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: 2 weeks away from potential GDB 7.4.1 release... Message-ID: <20120412171750.GX25623@adacore.com> References: <20120412153301.GW25623@adacore.com> <1334248104.31651.79.camel@homebase> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1334248104.31651.79.camel@homebase> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg00082.txt.bz2 > I would love to see a fix for the issue of the build failing if you > don't have makeinfo installed... I think it's already fixed but I don't > know if it was applied to the branch. I can look up the bug # if > needed. I am not opposed to this patch in principle, but a taking a look at the patch would allow us to evaluate its impact. Can you repost or send a link to that patch? In the meantime, it seems much easier to just apply the patch locally to your sources rather than wait for 7.4.1 or 7.5... -- Joel