From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4955 invoked by alias); 13 Apr 2012 13:16:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 4799 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Apr 2012 13:16:21 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 13:16:09 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q3DDFjnm024558 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 13 Apr 2012 09:15:45 -0400 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-70.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.70]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q3DDFeVj025576 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 13 Apr 2012 09:15:43 -0400 Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 13:16:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: 2 weeks away from potential GDB 7.4.1 release... Message-ID: <20120413131539.GC22952@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <20120412153301.GW25623@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120412153301.GW25623@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg00098.txt.bz2 Hello Joel, On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 17:33:01 +0200, Joel Brobecker wrote: > Any other changes that should go in the 7.4 branch (please, only refer to > very very safe fixes, or fixes to critical bugs)? there is still unfinished but it should make it in time. [patch+7.4] Fix gdbserver qXfer:libraries-svr4 regression in special cases http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2012-03/msg00120.html http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2012-04/msg00192.html Still maybe there should be an evaluation of each commit and their backporting like what happens with GCC stable branches. I admit I do not do it even in downstream/Fedora releases. Thanks, Jan