From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17506 invoked by alias); 18 Apr 2012 16:57:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 17491 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Apr 2012 16:57:24 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 16:57:12 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EFF51C6CF4; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 12:57:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id DDhT8EtxezwZ; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 12:57:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E1391C6CF3; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 12:57:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 13010145616; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 09:57:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 16:57:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Pedro Alves Cc: Joel Sherrill , Jan Kratochvil , Tom Tromey , "gdb@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: Will therefore GDB utilize C++ or not? Message-ID: <20120418165702.GE25623@adacore.com> References: <20120416065456.GA30097@host2.jankratochvil.net> <4F8ECB72.70708@redhat.com> <20120418151553.GA16768@host2.jankratochvil.net> <4F8EDD7B.2010602@redhat.com> <20120418155354.GA17912@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20120418160644.GC25623@adacore.com> <20120418161315.GC18303@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20120418162255.GD25623@adacore.com> <4F8EEC55.7080008@oarcorp.com> <4F8EF0BB.4070405@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F8EF0BB.4070405@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg00126.txt.bz2 > > Wading in late .. but is the gdbserver intended to run > > on an embedded RTOS with just threads? > > No, it assumes some more unixy-ish OS what spawns processes, > though it scales down to Linux with uclibc, bionic, and other > userspaces [...] The point remains valid, though, that GDBserver needs to remain reasonably small. We run LynxOS on boards that occasionally run out of memory, so resource management is a concern... -- Joel