From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19664 invoked by alias); 15 May 2012 05:34:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 19200 invoked by uid 22791); 15 May 2012 05:34:31 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 May 2012 05:34:19 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D72741C683F; Tue, 15 May 2012 01:34:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id KrNUTc5qJlgm; Tue, 15 May 2012 01:34:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EE381C682A; Tue, 15 May 2012 01:34:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 80722145616; Mon, 14 May 2012 22:34:09 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 05:34:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: oza Pawandeep Cc: Tom Tromey , gdb@sourceware.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [design change] record-replay linux ABI level Message-ID: <20120515053409.GO10253@adacore.com> References: <87sjf9qecr.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <87aa1gqhnq.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20120514145650.GF10253@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-05/txt/msg00061.txt.bz2 > so each arch file would have their own map, compare to current generic > map in linux-record.h If I understand what you are saying correctly, I think that this is what I had in mind. NB: I should point out that I have little knowledge of the process- record code. Just trying to help out with possible solutions if we think the best option is to have one generic enum. -- Joel