From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1501 invoked by alias); 18 May 2012 16:55:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 1490 invoked by uid 22791); 18 May 2012 16:55:29 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 May 2012 16:55:16 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9B1F1C6C70; Fri, 18 May 2012 12:55:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id gmKF-Mrsynu9; Fri, 18 May 2012 12:55:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8AA51C6B23; Fri, 18 May 2012 12:55:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E8D2F145616; Fri, 18 May 2012 09:55:00 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 16:55:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Yao Qi Cc: Mingjie Xing , gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Gdb online docs error? Message-ID: <20120518165500.GQ29339@adacore.com> References: <4FB6590A.6040704@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4FB6590A.6040704@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-05/txt/msg00085.txt.bz2 > I can access link > http://sourceware.org/gdb/current/onlinedocs/gdb/Sequences.html and > click "Command Files" in this page. Then, I see an error on "page not > found". > > I don't know how these html files are synced to sourceware.org server, > but I guess there might be some problem there. Maybe the tools on sourceware are too old for the current documentation, I am not sure. I can take a look, but just don't have the time for another 10-15 days :-(. Can we see if the documentation from the last release was properly generated? -- Joel