From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2442 invoked by alias); 2 Jun 2012 07:13:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 2430 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Jun 2012 07:13:26 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 02 Jun 2012 07:13:10 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q527D5HJ012389 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 2 Jun 2012 03:13:05 -0400 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-47.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.47]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q527D24J028752 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sat, 2 Jun 2012 03:13:04 -0400 Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2012 07:13:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Russell Shaw Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Will therefore GDB utilize C++ or not? Message-ID: <20120602071301.GA20548@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <20120526155005.GA30091@host2.jankratochvil.net> <4FC9BA2F.7030202@netspace.net.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4FC9BA2F.7030202@netspace.net.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-06/txt/msg00006.txt.bz2 On Sat, 02 Jun 2012 09:01:03 +0200, Russell Shaw wrote: > Hitting my F9 "compile" button would result in an annoying > half-second delay when compiling simple programs using the STL > (years ago when i did C++). Self written utility libraries such as > those already done in C in gdb could avoid that. Saving that half-second discourages contributors by using non-standard libraries for the same basic functionality they already know well from C++. Regards, Jan