From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1274 invoked by alias); 2 Jun 2012 11:10:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 1265 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Jun 2012 11:10:49 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 02 Jun 2012 11:10:28 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q52BANpB026136 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 2 Jun 2012 07:10:23 -0400 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-47.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.47]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q52BAJ2g024040 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sat, 2 Jun 2012 07:10:22 -0400 Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2012 11:10:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Russell Shaw Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Will therefore GDB utilize C++ or not? Message-ID: <20120602111019.GA26265@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <20120526155005.GA30091@host2.jankratochvil.net> <4FC9BA2F.7030202@netspace.net.au> <20120602071301.GA20548@host2.jankratochvil.net> <4FC9EF3A.8000701@netspace.net.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4FC9EF3A.8000701@netspace.net.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-06/txt/msg00010.txt.bz2 On Sat, 02 Jun 2012 12:47:22 +0200, Russell Shaw wrote: > A friend said when he was using the full STL, the delay was 8 seconds. This is too vague claim. Which hardware he used? Why was full STL used by a single CU? Was he using gold? And its incremental linking? > Wouldn't there be far more existing GDB contributors that would > understand C++'ified gdb libraries, than C++ coders that know > anything about the internals of gdb? It is a good question, my assumptions sure may be wrong. Regards, Jan