From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25859 invoked by alias); 7 Jun 2012 22:10:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 25842 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Jun 2012 22:10:24 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Jun 2012 22:10:11 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 532C51C6DC9; Thu, 7 Jun 2012 18:10:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id KT0HeZCZzXDR; Thu, 7 Jun 2012 18:10:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 195D71C62C7; Thu, 7 Jun 2012 18:10:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0928E145616; Thu, 7 Jun 2012 15:10:07 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 22:10:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: mikhail.terekhov@emc.com Cc: mingjie.xing@gmail.com, gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Gdb online docs error? Message-ID: <20120607221007.GS2709@adacore.com> References: <20120527145655.GA21176@adacore.com> <20120528140805.GA5066@adacore.com> <20120607165235.GH2709@adacore.com> <393A4D071DD24B45A370BEBB86AD05A201F37EC8B0@MX37A.corp.emc.com> <20120607215412.GR2709@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120607215412.GR2709@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-06/txt/msg00045.txt.bz2 > It looks like a bug in the HTML generation program (makeinfo). I took > a quick look, and it could be something to do with a confusion in > the handling of keys that have spaces in them. But the problem is > that the generated HTML is not straightforward, and I'm not a big > specialist either. I had already installed the latest version, > so the only upgrade possible would to be use a snapshot, which > I am not keen on doing. Unsurprisingly, we are not the only ones to hit that problem: http://osdir.com/ml/bug-texinfo-gnu/2009-04/msg00032.html The message indicates that GNU texinfo plans to transition to texi2html. But there has been no release of GNU texinfo that includes it (last release that I can find appears to be 4.13a published Sep 2008). There is a release of texi2html (5.0), that looks like it was published in July 2010. Perhaps we can try that. -- Joel