From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24293 invoked by alias); 12 Nov 2012 18:38:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 24284 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Nov 2012 18:38:38 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 18:38:35 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FC2D1C6095; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 13:38:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id YX+iR3id36PM; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 13:38:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D34F1C6086; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 13:38:34 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 89A3DC4CCC; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 10:38:18 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 18:38:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Pedro Alves Cc: Pierre Muller , gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: New ARI web page, generated using script inside CVS tree in gdb/contrib/ari directory Message-ID: <20121112183818.GR4847@adacore.com> References: <002701cdc0b9$542d2560$fc877020$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> <20121112180707.GQ4847@adacore.com> <50A13D2C.7070207@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50A13D2C.7070207@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg00013.txt.bz2 > strerror sounds like something gnulib might have a replacement for > too. Then we could get rid of safe_strerror, and just use strerror > everywhere. I had a look at that option, and I'm not sure whether it would work on Windows. But maybe I looked too quickly. If it works on windows, I am definitely in favor of that too. -- Joel