From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21467 invoked by alias); 16 Oct 2014 14:06:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 21456 invoked by uid 89); 16 Oct 2014 14:06:46 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 14:06:46 +0000 Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s9GE6dbT003556 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 16 Oct 2014 10:06:40 -0400 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-79.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.79]) by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s9GE6ZNh022919 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 16 Oct 2014 10:06:38 -0400 Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 14:06:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Phil Muldoon , =?utf-8?Q?=C3=96mer_Sinan_A=C4=9Facan?= , gdb Subject: Re: GDB C API -- does such a thing exist? Message-ID: <20141016140635.GA2062@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <543FBFCE.4030305@redhat.com> <20141016135413.GM4805@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141016135413.GM4805@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-10/txt/msg00040.txt.bz2 On Thu, 16 Oct 2014 15:54:13 +0200, Joel Brobecker wrote: > > No. Well let me qualify. There is a libgdb, but I have never used it > > and I am not sure anyone has for some many years. I am not sure how > > maintained it is either. Someone else might know more. > > I don't think there is a libgdb anymore. IIRC, Jan eliminated it, > because it was increasing the amount of time needed to be linked > (first generate the .a, next build using the .a). I did not eliminate it, one still can run "make libgdb.a". "libgdb.a" is just no longer build by default as "libgdb.a" is no longer built as a part of the "gdb" target to make the build faster. Jan