From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6347 invoked by alias); 29 Dec 2014 03:21:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 6333 invoked by uid 89); 29 Dec 2014 03:21:56 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: rock.gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 29 Dec 2014 03:21:55 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 658A9116215; Sun, 28 Dec 2014 22:21:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id CW4uLPMXRfDL; Sun, 28 Dec 2014 22:21:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D79F116214; Sun, 28 Dec 2014 22:21:52 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 224EA4100E; Mon, 29 Dec 2014 07:21:48 +0400 (RET) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 03:21:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Joel Sherrill Cc: Sergio Durigan Junior , Hannes Domani , "gdb@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: building gdb with TUI support on Windows Message-ID: <20141229032148.GG2098@adacore.com> References: <83lhltkwo4.fsf@gnu.org> <1007829038.1780704.1419691186453.JavaMail.yahoo@jws11139.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <87wq5bk4bq.fsf@redhat.com> <20141229024305.GF2098@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SW-Source: 2014-12/txt/msg00057.txt.bz2 > >I might have mentioned the idea a few years back, but it was > >very quickly dismissed ;-). > > Please don't remove it. If you disabled everything that didn't work on > windows, there would be no simulators either. Lol There is no risk of it being removed at the moment; but just to clarify, the suggestion I made at the time was not related to support on Windows (or lack of it) but to the perception that maybe people might not have been using it (which turned out to be wrong). Hence the dismissing ;-). -- Joel