From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 41538 invoked by alias); 11 Nov 2015 22:02:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 41529 invoked by uid 89); 11 Nov 2015 22:02:05 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=4.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: p3plwbeout03-02.prod.phx3.secureserver.net Received: from p3plsmtp03-02-2.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (HELO p3plwbeout03-02.prod.phx3.secureserver.net) (72.167.218.214) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 22:02:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([72.167.218.135]) by p3plwbeout03-02.prod.phx3.secureserver.net with bizsmtp id gN211r0012vs63s01N21ZN; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 15:02:02 -0700 X-SID: gN211r0012vs63s01 Received: (qmail 19554 invoked by uid 99); 11 Nov 2015 22:02:01 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" User-Agent: Workspace Webmail 5.15.9 Message-Id: <20151111150159.5c1bb9f86d671edec44bb378f25c04cc.170363295e.wbe@email03.secureserver.net> From: To: "taylor, david" , "gdb@sourceware.org" Subject: RE: (hardware) watchpoints and actions Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 22:02:00 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg00016.txt.bz2 >> The goal is to run at full speed until a watched location is=20 >> accessed in some prescribed manner. At that time, like a=20 >> tracepoint, execute some actions to collect information=20 >> and then continue at full speed. This sounds like a macro to execute on a (data|code) breakpoint. https://sourceware.org/gdb/onlinedocs/gdb/Break-Commands.html Doesn't this already exist? If not, what part of this existing feature needs to be fixed? Or are you saying that the watchpoints do not support macros like as described above? If so, it seems the UI solution if needed would be the same as the existing breakpoint-commands. -Duane.