From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 93934 invoked by alias); 6 Jan 2016 02:46:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 85973 invoked by uid 89); 6 Jan 2016 02:46:27 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=hear, heard X-HELO: rock.gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 06 Jan 2016 02:46:27 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BBE71166B7 for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 21:46:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id JXrj2shnzeBZ for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 21:46:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CB19116688 for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 21:46:24 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 84C9242E52; Wed, 6 Jan 2016 06:46:15 +0400 (RET) Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2016 02:46:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: git version has "-cvs" ? Message-ID: <20160106024615.GA7024@adacore.com> References: <20160105010204.GI25548@vapier.lan> <20160105095232.GE4385@adacore.com> <20160105202959.GN25548@vapier.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160105202959.GN25548@vapier.lan> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SW-Source: 2016-01/txt/msg00003.txt.bz2 > > FWIW, none that I can think of. > > shall i push that now ? or wait until after the 7.11 branch ? I would say, go ahead now. Before or after branching does not make a difference, I think. If there were objections to this, I imagine we would have heard them already; and if we hear some objections afterwards and they are sufficiently strong to trigger a discussion (which I doubt, for a patch like this), it'll be trivial to revert while we rediscuss. -- Joel