* using automake to generate Makefile.in @ 2016-01-07 21:42 Mike Frysinger 2016-01-08 19:11 ` Jan Kratochvil 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Mike Frysinger @ 2016-01-07 21:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gdb [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 198 bytes --] is there a reason we don't use automake in the tree to manage Makefile.in ? i want to use it in the sim/ tree as it would make my life a lot easier. we already require automake for aclocal. -mike [-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: using automake to generate Makefile.in 2016-01-07 21:42 using automake to generate Makefile.in Mike Frysinger @ 2016-01-08 19:11 ` Jan Kratochvil 2016-01-08 19:53 ` Mike Frysinger 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Jan Kratochvil @ 2016-01-08 19:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gdb On Thu, 07 Jan 2016 22:42:49 +0100, Mike Frysinger wrote: > is there a reason we don't use automake in the tree to manage > Makefile.in ? IIRC Tom Tromey (also a coauthor of automake) wanted to do that or at least he said it would be good to do that but just nobody has never done so. Jan ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: using automake to generate Makefile.in 2016-01-08 19:11 ` Jan Kratochvil @ 2016-01-08 19:53 ` Mike Frysinger 2016-01-08 21:03 ` Mike Frysinger 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Mike Frysinger @ 2016-01-08 19:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jan Kratochvil; +Cc: gdb, tromey [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 566 bytes --] On 08 Jan 2016 20:11, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > On Thu, 07 Jan 2016 22:42:49 +0100, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > is there a reason we don't use automake in the tree to manage > > Makefile.in ? > > IIRC Tom Tromey (also a coauthor of automake) wanted to do that or at least he > said it would be good to do that but just nobody has never done so. do we have a requirement that it be done treewide ? or would people be fine with me doing (starting) in sim/ ? doing it in just sim/ would allow for some limited testing w/out breaking lots of people ... -mike [-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: using automake to generate Makefile.in 2016-01-08 19:53 ` Mike Frysinger @ 2016-01-08 21:03 ` Mike Frysinger 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Mike Frysinger @ 2016-01-08 21:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jan Kratochvil, gdb [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 777 bytes --] On 08 Jan 2016 14:53, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On 08 Jan 2016 20:11, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > > On Thu, 07 Jan 2016 22:42:49 +0100, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > is there a reason we don't use automake in the tree to manage > > > Makefile.in ? > > > > IIRC Tom Tromey (also a coauthor of automake) wanted to do that or at least he > > said it would be good to do that but just nobody has never done so. > > do we have a requirement that it be done treewide ? > or would people be fine with me doing (starting) in sim/ ? > doing it in just sim/ would allow for some limited testing > w/out breaking lots of people ... i probably should have looked harder ... some dirs are already using automake like ld/ gas/ bfd/ gold/ and more. i'll convert sim/ too. -mike [-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-01-08 21:03 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2016-01-07 21:42 using automake to generate Makefile.in Mike Frysinger 2016-01-08 19:11 ` Jan Kratochvil 2016-01-08 19:53 ` Mike Frysinger 2016-01-08 21:03 ` Mike Frysinger
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).