From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-46859-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 110731 invoked by alias); 26 Feb 2019 11:58:21 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 110712 invoked by uid 89); 26 Feb 2019 11:58:21 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=
X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 11:58:20 +0000
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22])	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))	(No client certificate requested)	by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D15F30A6970;	Tue, 26 Feb 2019 11:58:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from host1.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-65.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.65])	by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F3A11001938;	Tue, 26 Feb 2019 11:58:18 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 11:58:00 -0000
From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
To: David Griffiths <dgriffiths@undo.io>
Cc: Andrew Burgess <andrew.burgess@embecosm.com>, dwk <dwks42@gmail.com>,	GDB <gdb@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: Is nexti confused by pushq?
Message-ID: <20190226115815.GA1511291@host1.jankratochvil.net>
References: <CA++j6c4bKPiWgYsSp2ajPLrJmv4wQ6Fb_Z=nXfs7TTOjzAqKRg@mail.gmail.com> <CAPkwjGtoLAPg6dnPOp5fe9-dqFDerhmATESu_wZaUtOOQOp4hA@mail.gmail.com> <20190226073236.GD10887@embecosm.com> <20190226101245.GA1496753@host1.jankratochvil.net> <CA++j6c7=KNZgErDbEyEi81MUAVwYKeDC8dfPxGT_w=EBqUzNsA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CA++j6c7=KNZgErDbEyEi81MUAVwYKeDC8dfPxGT_w=EBqUzNsA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.3 (2019-02-01)
X-SW-Source: 2019-02/txt/msg00067.txt.bz2

On Tue, 26 Feb 2019 12:50:37 +0100, David Griffiths wrote:
> Ok, so in my case this is generated code with no debug info (Java JIT
> generated) so does that mean I shouldn't attempt to use nexti? (I've got
> other issues which probably preclude using nexti anyway but just curious)

The proper fix is in OpenJDK so that it produces proper debug info for the
JITted module (but I do not know the details of GDB JIT modules).
Otherwise it is always some sort of workaround.


Jan